A closer look at a dietitian’s bajra, undhiyu and dry coconut advice, plus dermatology guidance on hair loss and scalp care.
On October 15, 2026, The Economic Times reported that dietitian Rujuta Diwekar recommended bajra, undhiyu and dry coconut as seasonal foods in a post about winter hair fall and dandruff.
The recommendation puts traditional food choices into a conversation about visible changes. For readers concerned about their hair or skin, the useful question is how much weight to give the benefits attached to those choices.
The news item is built around three foods and the benefits attributed to them. Here is what the report actually describes.
According to The Economic Times, bajra is a winter millet that can be eaten as rotis, laddoos or raab. The article links it with energy and hair-fall benefits.
The preparation ideas are the most concrete part of that description. They show how the grain might appear in a meal rather than setting out a separate supplement routine. For someone interested in seasonal cooking, that is the practical food information to take from this part of the story.
The report describes undhiyu as a Gujarati and Maharashtrian winter dish made with pulses, vegetables and wild greens. It attributes gut-health and digestion benefits to the dish.
The Economic Times characterizes dry coconut as an energy-boosting food. It also links it to sustained workout energy and smooth, glowing skin.
This is where the story moves most directly from food choice to a visible beauty outcome. The wording about skin is central to its appeal and deserves the same careful reading as the hair-related claims.
The Economic Times item is a lifestyle-news report of dietitian advice, not a clinical trial. It does not cite studies or provide measurements demonstrating the claimed changes in hair fall, gut health, energy or skin. There are no original trial results here from which to calculate an effect size or a likelihood of benefit.
An expert recommendation and a measured clinical result answer different questions. The recommendation tells us what the dietitian suggests. A clinical result would need to show what happened after a defined intervention. Without that distinction, an ordinary food suggestion can start to sound like evidence of a change in hair or skin.
The same boundary applies to dandruff: the available evidence does not establish these foods as a treatment for it.
The report’s discussion of dry coconut also invokes medium-chain triglycerides and proposed effects on energy and skin. Those effects are not independently verified in the material behind the story.
The article also suggests eating undhiyu once or twice a fortnight. That frequency is reported dietary advice, not a schedule shown to improve hair or skin outcomes.
The fair conclusion is narrow: the story documents a recommendation and meal ideas. The recommendation also cannot identify the cause of an individual reader’s shedding or scalp symptoms.
The most direct use of the report is as a source of meal ideas. Bajra preparations and the description of undhiyu offer ways to think about seasonal cooking. Dry coconut is another food the dietitian highlighted.
Personal dietary choices can be discussed with a qualified dietitian when health circumstances make those decisions individual. The relevant distinction is between choosing a food and using it to address a symptom.
Persistent or concerning shedding is a reason to seek qualified evaluation. The American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) says a dermatologist may use blood tests or a scalp biopsy when a medical cause is suspected.
The possible concerns it names include disease, vitamin deficiency, hormone imbalance and infection. This is a conditional approach based on what the clinician suspects. It is not a recommendation that everyone with hair loss undergo the same tests.
A separate point in the AAD guidance concerns biotin, iron and zinc. For hair loss, the academy advises using these supplements only when testing shows a deficiency. It warns that taking them when levels are normal can be harmful.
The practical implication is to base supplement decisions on the evaluation rather than on a food story or on shedding alone. Decisions about an individual’s testing and supplements belong with a qualified healthcare professional.
For flakes, the AAD’s hair-care guidance addresses washing and shampoo use. It advises matching wash frequency to how often hair becomes dirty or oily and applying shampoo to the scalp.
These are general scalp-care principles. A reader whose symptoms remain concerning can bring those concerns to a qualified professional rather than trying to translate a seasonal food list into a scalp-care plan.
At Younell, our focus is translating research into clear information about skin, hair and visible aging. Our research-led articles and longer science guides keep useful evidence distinct from marketing claims.
Future research would need a more focused question: does eating these foods lead to measurable changes in hair shedding, scalp symptoms or skin appearance compared with an appropriate alternative?
For now, the clearest takeaway is to keep food inspiration and personal care decisions in their proper places. Seasonal dishes can be considered as foods, while ongoing hair or scalp concerns deserve attention to their cause. A calm reading of the evidence leaves room for both.
Stay connected for research and practical guidance on skin, hair, collagen, nutrition and beauty longevity. Clear ideas for people who want to understand how appearance changes with age and make better-informed choices over time.
Understand your skin, hair and body better without chasing every new trend, treatment or promise.
explore the Blog
